The most important issues of Edmund Burke’s Parliamentary career are encapsulated by opposition to authoritarian government, formed of his Irish heritage. The political contexts of Ireland, America, India, and France vary significantly, but Burke always is on the side of ordered liberty. The Irish question is however the most problematic because Burke had to abjure his roots and adopt an English Protestant (Anglican) persona in order to be part of the political conversation. Yet the French Revolution drew his most vehement response because he rightly intuited its attempt to expel all tradition and custom (especially religion). Burke believed it is not the institutions (forms of government) which are the source of political malfunction, but human fallibility itself (p. 603). O’Brien resolutely challenges the Namierite school, which dismissed Burke’s role because he rarely held high office, by demonstrating Burke’s impact on the major events of his era. The list of seminal events also includes the Whig struggle with George III and Pitt the Younger’s ascension to Prime Ministership. The book is considered ‘unreliable’ by some historians as O’Brien is willing to conjecture and draw conclusions where documentary evidence is silent. Ultimately his project is to reclaim Burke for the liberal tradition. An excellent appendix on the connection between the French and Russian revolutions. Dense but worthy.
Author: kurto
4. Welsh, Great Southern Land (11 Mar 2023)
Australia developed very quickly in comparison with contemporary British dominions, the Federation launching with provisions for a near-complete welfare state. Whereas the high wages, high tariffs and White Australia consensus persisted until the eighth decade of the 20th century, and the new baseline not established until Howard ratified the Hawke-Keating Accord.
The continent’s settlement had opposed the world’s oldest society with its most enterprising: terra nullius was fairly applied (if regretted). By 1800 emancipist and former officers had made New South Wales self-sufficient in food, but marine products remained the principal export until the development of merino wool. 19th-century Aussie colonies were readily granted self-government, as in Canada Colonial NSW busied itself with land policy, immigration, and education. Frontier conflict, largely dormant until midcentury, sharpened with expanding agriculture and livestock and missionary activity (Anglicans being a less temperate influence than elsewhere in the empire). 1846’s revised leaseholding law converted Squatters from agitators to defenders of status quo.
In 1849, colonial legislatures were authorized to modify their own constitutions and unlike 20th century Africa, they quickly grew into the role, the author approving of such Chartist features as no property qualification, equalized voting districts, votes for women, and pay for MPs. Contrary to affinities for Ned Kelly and bushranging (or at least goldmining, sheep shearing, and droving), 35% of the population lived in the main cities (25% in Sydney or Melbourne), generally in crowded, poor conditions. Save for foreign policy and defense, they were largely independent. Governments grew up not by application of logic but common sense: Australia’s conservative bent was due not to British influence but legislative elites’ mistrust of democracy. Victoria was unsurprisingly less prepared for growth than NSW – 15 years after its founding Melbourne’s population of 140,000 was greater than Sydney not to mention Bristol, England, or Edinburgh, Scotland. In 1860, there were 1 million acres under crop, by 1900 7.5 million.
Inter-colonial agreement had been possible since Lord Grey floated the idea of union in 1848 but the first generations of responsible government had been more interested in practical matters. So the tariff was the main issue of the first Federation conference in 1891, along with the nature of the upper house. The Canadian model seemed most relevant, as the Westminster tradition was unwritten, and the US seen compromised by civil war / racism. (Meanwhile, because of current account surplus, Aussie debt per capital was £50 versus £12 in Canada.) The Federation charter was remarkable for anticipating (in section 51) the welfare state: government was given powers to resolve industrial disputes and to provide for old-age and widows’ pensions, maternity allowances, unemployment, medicines, and medical and dental treatment. Organized labor had not been part of its drafting, yet Australia was soon known as a workman’s paradise.
As nascent industries and labor wanted protection, while primary producers and conservative allies sought access to English markets, the matter was resolved by ‘imperial preference’, three-quarters of imports originating in the empire. Support for the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 was unanimous, led by Labor and Queensland; it was not abandoned until 1966 (under Holt) and renounced in 1991 (by Hawke). Modern wage awards lasted still longer, as employers demanded tariff protection in return. Recessions naturally led to decreased wages and inevitably to labor unrest.
The author’s portrayal of the postwar era is conventional and less obviously triumphant yet more balanced than, for example, Macintyre. Where there was ‘a hint of Northern Ireland’ in prewar Australia – politics refracting religion (Labor = Catholic, Liberal = Protestant, characterizing wide swaths of society and government) – with the influx of Italians, discrimination against working-class Catholics diminished and stereotypes broke down. By 1970, multiculturalism was established in Sydney and Melbourne, the country towns remaining Anglo-Irish. Australia’s role in Vietnam left fewer scars than in the US. Menzies predominated; Whitlam shook Labor from its party centralization; Fraser’s Liberals struggled to articulate a positive program, as so often with statist conservatives. The Hawke-Keating Accord – trade-union wage restraint in exchange for controlling inflation and job creation plus award reform – broke the postwar prototype; Howard honored its resolution while also surmounting the problems of Mabo and Wik, the latter imperiling 70 percent of Australian land title. Republicanism doesn’t address the country’s ongoing racial animosities.
Often usefully comparative; largely celebratory though seeming regretful of racism by book’s end. Excellent maps.
1. Wolf, Wired (14 Jan 2006)
Narrates the rise and fall of Louis Rosetto, visionary of digital technology as catalyst for cultural transformation. The first third sketches Rosetto’s nomadic existence before landing in San Francisco in time to exploit the first Internet boom. The book then hurtles through the tale of
- Wired
magazine as a microcosm of the dot-com phenomenon. Much of the tale centers on Rosetto’s obliviousness and Andrew Anker’s cynicism. It all ends rather abruptly when Conde Nast and Lycos purchase the magazine and web properties, respectively. Like
- Burn Rate
, there is ample personal connection.
2. Gaddis, Cold War (21 Jan 2006)
A synthetic history of the Cold War that divides the major events thematically rather than chronologically. The most enlightening chapters outline how the wartime alliance dissolved into hostility and how the West emerged from the moral stupor of detente. The roles of Reagan and Thatcher are understated, however, and a fuller application of Jeanne Kirkpatrick’s
- Dictatorships and Double Standards
would have balanced the treatment of client states and moral equivalence. A good bibliography.
3. Coyle, Lance Armstrong’s War (27 Jan 2006)
Reveals the performance requirements and culture of pro racing and the personality of Lance Armstrong. The author follows the Tour de France great through the 2004 season, when Armstrong won his record sixth consecutive title. Though Armstrong is often reviled for his competitiveness, it’s unclear why the habits that made him a champion become odious as he seeks to defend his stature. [The book and this summary were both prior to his exposure as a drugs cheat.] Armstrong largely gets a pass on rampant allegations of doping, and fair enough: innocent until proven guilty.
12. Richter, Political Theory of Montesquieu (2 July)
An extended survey of Montesquieu’s works and selections from the most famous, notably Persian Letters and Spirit of the Laws.
- Survey
Rome fell because wealth became despised by the populace, so the patricians ceded their privileges in hopes of retaining access to power
More states have perished from corruption of moeurs than lawbreaking
Whenever in a republic all is tranquil, the state is no longer free. True harmony includes dissonance
Spirit
Solon divided the classes not to determine eligibility to vote but to hold office
In a tyranny, religion is the depository of moeurs and fundamental laws because the judiciary is unreliable
In monarchies, free speech is not on behalf of truth but because candor indicates power
Since everything human must end, so virtuous government must end, usually when the legislature becomes more corrupt than the executive. In a democracy, first comes corruption, then the laws are no longer executed. Once principles are corrupted, even good laws work against the state. Corrupt republics rarely do great things: only a people with simple moeurs establish societies, cities, laws.
In a democracy, power is the chief characteristic of the people; liberty is its effect, but not the source of power. Liberty is tranquility derived from personal security. However, the greater the apparent advantages of liberty, the nearer the republic is to losing it. First comes the petty tyrants, then the single dictator.
True equality is far from extreme equality. True equality is not that everyone or no one commands; but that we command or obey only equals. Citizens whose condition is so weak may be considered to have no will of their own: they are incapable of taking part in the execution of society’s ends.
Republics succeed in small geographies. In large ones, the state’s resources corrupt officeholders: the public good recedes from view. Sparta persisted because its sole end was liberty.
Harrington explore how far a state’s constitution may carry liberty, but forgot liberty’s essence. As Tacitus observed, it’s extraordinary that corrupt Roman conquerors led Germanic barbarians to solidify those moeurs which led to English constitutionalism.
There are two types of tyranny, the real and violent, and tyranny of opinion, when those who govern institute things contrary to the nation’s moeurs.
Political vices are not necessarily moral vices and vice versa, a reasonwhy laws against the spirit of society are tenuous. Means exist for preventing crimes (penalties), and can serve to change moeurs. To assert that laws or religion do not always restrain society is to overlook that frequently they do. Civility is superior to politeness: the former prevents us from displaying our own vices. The more people in a nation, the more evident and necessary are both.
4. Cafferty, Suitcase Number Seven (16 Feb 2006)
A biography, initially presented as a faux autobiography, detailing the 1950s rugby career and subsequent bachelorhood and alcohol-ravaged life of Munster scrumhalf Tom Cleary. Cleary was 17 times an Ireland replacement but never earned a cap in the era before substitutes; the author presents this shortfall as symbolic of Cleary’s travails after rugby — never reaching his potential. The title refers to Cleary’s 1960 tour of South Africa and Rhodesia, which places him a teammate of Syd Miller and Tony O’Reilly. Though depicted with great sympathy, the details of Cleary’s mature years are less interesting for rugby readers. The appendix is rich with statistics and match reports from Munster, Ireland, and the SA tour.
5. Johnson, Modern Times (2006)
A tour of the principal socioeconomic, intellectual, and political events and trends of the 20th century through the 1980s. Key observations: political violence is infectious and degenerative in nature; it is highly important for leaders to be seen as moral and ethical. In the last century, the left was responsible for the bulk of the disastrous experiments with social engineering in Russia, China, and various socialist outposts, but the right also participated as in Germany, Italy, and Spain. The author convincingly points to the enduring role of individual agency as well as the law of unintended effects. Because he is not a professional academic and is conservative, he is considered idiosyncratic but his conclusions have never been refuted.
6. Lewis, Moneyball (2 Apr 2006)
Follows the back-office management of the Oakland As’ 2002 season to uncover how the small-market team defies baseball’s conventional wisdom. For GM Billy Beane, on-base percentage (i.e., not making outs) is superior to any other statistical measurement, and players (especially minor leaguers) can be acquired at a significant discount (or sold at a premium) to the market’s valuation. Joe Morgan emerges as the arch defender of the status quo. One corollary that’s not addressed: if you don’t allow runs you can’t lose — defense wins championships after all.
7. MacMillan, 1919 (8 May 2006)
Narrates the course of the Paris Peace Conference following World War I to assess its consequences as measured against contemporary expectations as well in hindsight. Clemenceau (‘bury me standing, facing Germany’), Lloyd George, and Wilson as well as Balfour and Curzon are key figures. The study reviews the proceedings regarding European, Asian, and Middle Eastern regions by country, focusing heavily on the redrawing of borders. Self-determination, mixed nationalism newly awakened by the collapse of the Habsburg, Russian, and Ottoman empires, proved explosive; however, the course of twenty years, not simply the treaty, led to 1939.