14. Plumb, England in the 18th Century (4 Aug 2017)

An opinionated survey of the 18th century which ever seems to anticipate the coming of the 20th. Plumb divides the years 1714-1815 into three eras, those of Walpole, Chatham, and Pitt the younger, while elucidating the incipience of the Industrial Revolution from 1750. At the start of the era, for all the excitement of the closing of the revolutionary era, the country was decidedly premodern. Improved social organization emerged through local administrative reform. So too politics were personal rather than based in the party: Walpole sought to marginalize Tories but was too engaged in courtly intrigue to be a master statesman; his usage of patronage enabled the Duke of Newcastle to establish the Whig ascendancy at the expense of the Hanovers; the landed gentry became the opposition. Chatham, taking power in 1756, surmounted the French but shortly England lost the American colonies as England under George III failed to recognize they had come of age. But she gained immense wealth and power from India. The now-familiar enclosures of the English countryside were taking shape, while towns began turning from administrative centers into early industrial hubs centered around the mill or mine (instead of the feudal castle). Social organization improved with still more local administration, and in combination with improved medicine and public health, helped the poor live longer and so create a rising commercial elite — who bumped up against the squirearchy. Burke’s campaign for economic reform (of the monarchy) trumped association reform (of parliament), which had to wait until 1832. Also in the second half of the century, Bohemian romantics abjured aristocracy and classicism, and embraced the French Revolution, as did Fox, whose break with Burke split the party for a generation. Most of the nation rallied behind Pitt (supported by George and the City of London) against the French threat, initially by sea power alone, and then to the standard of Wellington. The English emerged justifiably proud but also arrogant.

2. Davies, History of Wales (15 Jan 2018)

A sociopolitical chronicle of Wales from the Roman era to the early 21st century, emphasizing its loss of nationhood and reasons why the Principality failed to recover it during the age of nationalism in the 1800s and 1900s.
Offa’s Dyke separated Brythonic Welsh from Britons, but there were no significant racial distinctions in the British Isles. The Saxons seized the lands most Romanized, but Celtic culture and language proved durable. Unlike Ireland, Welsh high culture to ~ 800 developed in isolation, and the ‘kingdom’ united through marriage not conquest. Welsh law was based on custom not statute, aspiring to order among the clans (not punishment); inter-marriage weakened the clans. The acceptance from 871 that Alfred had claims on Welsh lands set subordination well in motion. The Norman conquest connected the British Isles to feudal Europe through the Latin church and the 12th-century Renaissance. The Welsh were equals to the Normans, especially after the death of William II in 1100. Llywelyn the Great (d. 1240) won Gwynedd’s primary among the Welsh regions; son Dafydd ap Llellwyn was the first to call himself Prince of Wales; Llywelyn ap Gruffudd was acknowledged by Henry III in 1267’s Treaty of Montgomery. Thus Wales had all the elements of statehood but not independence. Edward I, the most powerful medieval English king, executed Dafydd ap Gruffudd and destroyed this Wales in 1282-83. The country needed time to jell; it fell not inevitably but through a combination of contemporary events. Though English law subsequently replaced the Welsh code, poetry remained; English focus on Wales helped Scotland to persist.
In the 14th century the Welsh Marcher lords were seen as lawless. Owain Glyndwr’s rising of 1399 was a peasant revolt backed by clerics. Penal laws against the Welsh church created a power vacuum filled by the gentry, perpetuating belief in hierarchical society. In the 15th century coastal trade including with Ireland expanded while peasants of the valleys returned to the southern lowlands. With the passage of 1536’s Act of Union (followed by adjustments in 1543), an act of aggrandizement, Wales became an ‘internal colony’ for the next 250 years (to approximately 1770). The Counter Reformation failed; this was the height of the gentry’s reign. Renaissance Wales was a conservative culture, uninterested in humanism, ‘behind’ the continent, lacking centers of wealth (i.e., towns). The upper class began to learn English, especially as its sons sent to English universities, often to study law, since they were no longer welcome in Europe’s Catholic schools. The ‘squirearchy’ supported the Stuart monarchs, conscious of Welsh coasts being open to invasion (ship money) and averse to Puritan theology. The gentry was anglicizing by marriage, whereas Nonconformism was Gaelic. The Welsh Bible saved the language.
In the election of 1713, only 4 of 27 Welsh seats at Westminster were won by Whigs: the party of the Hanover court was opposed by the Welsh country gentry. The population numbered 500,000 in 1770, and was to grow to 1.1 million by 1850, much more quickly than the doubling over the previous 12 centuries. In a striking assertion, the author contends industrialization turned more on new sources of energy and transport – copper for ironworks such as steam engines and railways – than on the factory system. Following centuries of dependence on English trade, the 18th century opened the northwest ports to new markets. In the south, Merthyr Tydfil’s iron was to become the main resource of modern Welsh growth, supplemented by coal, limestone, timber, and water. Industrialization pulled populace to Glamorgan and Monmouth, thereby realigning the country’s hitherto equal distribution. Swansea, Neath, Cardiff, and Newport were all connected to the coalfields by 1800 by canal or railway; Cardiff, the 25th biggest Welsh town in 1801, grew to 4th by 1880. Railways equally served to break down the isolation of rural communities. The Gaelic speakers were typically Methodist; the urbanites were Baptist or Independent. Therefore rural areas favored hierarchical presbytery, while industrial regions were congregational, meaning the latter never achieved a national moral authority. By the end of the 19th century, the erstwhile even distribution of populace had become 2 of 3 Welshmen living in the coal valleys or the coastal cities; but the country’s values remained rural. Many churches were built, promoting Gaelic. But from 1830 the Welsh chanceries were absorbed into English system, making the courts expensive and effectively out of reach of Welsh farmers. The Rebecca Riots, evidencing hatred of toll roads raising the cost of bringing crops to market, were a kind of rural Chartism. Faint-hearted Welsh nationalism in the 19th century reflects succumbing to English Victorian virtue: the Welsh were too concerned with respectability. Simultaneously, Nonconformism and the Welsh language couldn’t find common cause, particularly as British initiatives to expand schooling also anglicized (the so-called Treachery of the Blue Books). In the 1870s English speakers surpassed the Welsh.
In the 1880s Liberals sought Disestablishment only in Wales, on the premise of its nationhood. Conservatives were maneuvered into opposition, presaging the end of squirearchy. (By contrast, county government fell abruptly.) Freehold tenure grew rapidly since land, no longer the key to power were sold, and became the majority by 1950. Welsh nationalism, active at century’s end, peaked in 1900. There was no pronounced Republican element in Welsh Home Rule, only hopes for regional parliament: Radicalism was sufficient to win Conservative opposition but not worker allegiance. Emigration to Liverpool accelerated from 1880. The rise of rugby owed to physical labor creating taste for physical recreation. Employers believed organized games promoted organized workforce. Clubs in turn drew on communal tradition.
At 1900, at least one quarter of world energy trade originated in Wales, while the remainder of British coal was primarily for domestic use: Wales was geared to the world market. The coal towns fomented Welsh working class values, Nonconformist and socialist. The latter worked against nationalism because of proletarian solidarity; but the coalfields also promoted Gaelic, and the language was vital to nationalism because Welsh law had disappeared and boundaries were attenuated (in contrast with Scotland). But non-speakers also saw themselves as Welsh, defined by Radical politics, rugby, churchgoing and garrulous sociability. Neither model was relevant to the Marcher borders or northern seaside towns.
The religious revival of 1904-05 presaged the Liberal win of 1906, opposed to the 1902 Education Act, in favor of temperance. Miners were the only group to strike during World War I, going against Lloyd George, proof of its fundamental militancy. Postwar reforms brought socialism early to Wales but Labour nonetheless eclipsed the Liberals in by-elections. Amid the era’s ‘revolutionary spirit’ (e.g., Soviet Russia or Berlin), Welsh unionists opposed the Royal Coal Commission of 1919, which had declined to recommend nationalization. Over 1918-22, one quarter of Welsh land was sold, as land was no longer the sole source of power. Finally the estates were broken up; however the selloff was also an Anglicizing force because the English were the highest bidders, and promoted consolidation of farms, halving the number of them. Conversely, Welsh emigration now centered on London and the southeast, as the Merseyside was slowing down.
The long 20th-century depression began in 1925 with the initial decline of coal employment – the trend terminally accelerating in 1960s – due to the collapse of overseas markets. The improvement of Labour’s prospects at Westminster from 1922 undermined nationalism (though the Liberals polled credibly until 1938). The failure of the General Strike of 1926 persuaded union leaders to abandon syndicalism for Westminster. The Five in Llyn arson trial of 1937 renewed nationalism. Over the first two years of World War II, Wales received 200,000 immigrants, restoring its peak population. After its end, two thirds of factories were sponsored by Labour government; however, renewed iron and related industries served to forge ties with the Midlands. In all, it was the most socialist region of the UK, with 40 percent of the workforce in state bodies and 60 percent controlled by the state. But Atlee and Labour tended to see not Wales but regions for purposes of planning (with a second wave of coming in during 1958-64), while Bevan was keen on solidarity. By 1960 the boom-to-bust mining cycle was complete: workers accepted pit closures without regret. Nearly one quarter of Welsh lived in council houses.
Nationalism was spurred by Welsh awareness of higher living standards in England, while Conservative electoral success helped to promote Plaid Cymru, as did Cardiff’s continuing rise capped by the 1970 completion of the national stadium. The success of the Scottish National Party aided the tabling of the 1978 Wales Act, but Labour, government institutions, and the chattering classes were against and it polled just 25 percent in plebiscite. Kinnock’s 1983 ascension marked the first Labour leader from the coalfield, but Scargill’s 1984 strike received tepid support.
In the 1990s, the Welsh regional budget allocation grew to £7 billion from £1.7 in 1979. At decade’s end, in 1997, with Scottish devolution having succeeded one week earlier and the Gaelic speakers campaigning more effectively, Wales passed its home rule act, the choice now being either Wales or Wales-plus-England. The most important outcome of devolution (to date) has been re-introduction of Conservatism as a political force. The Internet has promoted Gaelic, while in the 21st century state support for a Welsh education system improved; the European Union also has been helpful. Rugby in the professional era rose and fell with the economy, important because the national team is the country’s primary cultural product. Welsh identity is primarily cultural and social, as compared with Scotland’s legal and constitutional presence.

10. Beer, Modern British Politics (23 Jun 2018)

Traces the development and practice of British politics from the late 19th century to the 1950s, highlighting the consolidation of government and economic production and consumption in the ‘collective era’. Beer first describes four premodern mindsets: old Tory (hierarchic, corporatist), old Whig (which transposed executive power to the cabinet), liberal, and Radical. The Enclosure Acts of the 1700s indicated the introduction of group politics (albeit aristocracy, the balanced constitution, and mercantilism remained dominant), in a long-term transition from patronage to party. In the 1800s, the primary distinction between liberals and Radicals lay in the theory of representation, one favoring liberty to act one’s conscience (the ‘masterless man’) and the other the ‘will of the majority’; Radical politics nonetheless incompletely utilized party to express class and ideological ends, according to later Socialists. The collective era, which reached its height in the 1950s, introduced or reified corporatist forms of a managed economy in combination with the welfare state. Beer then analyzes the workings of the Labour Party since the 1890s. Socialist doctrine held that party program reflects class interest, and all important decisions were to be taken before reaching Parliament. In 1907, the party formally voted itself power to instruct its MPs, although Radical views of the state’s role in alleviating evil and creating good persisted until the 1920s. The miners union’s joining the Trades Union Congress in 1909 was initially seen as a setback, until its commitment to nationalization during World War I. In 1917, Labour broke with David Lloyd George; in 1918 it committed to state ownership of the means of production, a which was unchallenged until 1951. Beer writes that Labour had to do so to differentiate itself after the ‘entente cordial’ with Liberals in 1907. On taking power as a minority government in 1929, Ramsay MacDonald faced the choice of ideology or pragmatism. Needing Liberal support, he along with Snowden, Thomas, Henderson, and Webb chose the latter. By 1931, absent a clear answer to the depression, MacDonald was forced to accede to 10 percent cut in unemployment benefits in order to win loans from New York banks. Allowed to play a large role in Churchill’s wartime government, Atlee executed the Socialist nationalization program over 1945-51; however, pressed by increasingly negative balance of payments and simultaneous demand for domestic goods, the party-government determined to steer workers into export trades or production of popular goods. The problem became closing the ‘manpower gap’ and reducing volatility of demand, finance being secondary. But after the TUC’s 1946 opposition to wage restraint, Hugh Dalton was replaced by Stafford Cripps, who returned from physical controls to market manipulation – a shift which included manufacturers accepting reduced prices and profits. The deal fell apart in 1950 (following 1949’s devaluation of sterling), at which time the unions asserted a measure of independence from Labour, in order to directly participate in collectivist bargaining. This was crucial in forging the new social contract, the paradigm of the managed economy, which Beer dates to 1940 (not 1945, because it was then workers accepted sacrifices to win the war). Henceforth, class was again not inherently political and determinist. In the 1950s, commitment to nationalization and its residual class image came to hurt Labour (Beer notes that 1/3 of the working class consistently voted Conservative throughout), presaging party change. The Fabians counterattacked but the Parliamentary leadership along with the TUC, which provided more than 50 percent of party revenue, prevailed. Turning to the Conservative party, Beer revisits the old Tory and Disraeli’s ‘Tory democracy’ mindsets: belief in hierarchy; that society is an organic unit with a traditional (not rational) social ethic; that politics isn’t the highest calling but rather is an obligation in service of society; that the governing class leads by virtue of talent; that voters choose leaders, not policy, because of the leadership’s being in tune with changing circumstances, tradition, interest groups, and of course electoral calculation. Thus, in the 1930s the less ideological, more adaptable Tories converted to monetary expansion, mercantilism, and industrial and agriculture ‘rationalization’, thereby abandoning gold and free trade. Tariff ‘reform’, headed by Chamberlain, was an important step toward the managed economy. Trade associations, rising in response to unions (and in contrast to US antitrust doctrine), were the gateway to producer group representation. By the 1950s, the Conservatives too were ready for collectivism, in which 1) the managed economy relied on bargaining with producer groups and 2) the welfare state accommodated consumer interests, as represented by party-government bidding for votes. In the collective era, government couldn’t be separated from production and consumption: ‘consumer sovereignty’ trumped popular sovereignty, Beer concludes. Yet differences remained: Labour focused on equality of outcomes, the Tories, who presumed inequality because of hierarchy, on distribution of power. Thus the question of morality – the just distribution of power to rule – persisted: voluntarism, the view that human wishes are the basis of legitimacy, conflicts with rationalism, a theory of fair ends. Apart from Beer’s framework, collectivism was upended by the reemergence of supply-side economics, that prices communicate demand and so the allocation of resources and rewards.